|
Worcester Photographic Collection, courtesy of the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan. (http://ocw.mit.edu/) |
It was a bit of a surprise to learn that my ancestors were European – let alone of aristocratic stock (see My Mexican, Spanish, Irish ancestry?). I have only known myself as either Filipino or Canadian and, on some days, both. My dad is a very proud Filipino who idealized his impoverished post-war childhood. If there was any sense of him having any European privilege, it was never made known. So I had no idea his mother was raised among the elite and, for whatever reason, left its’ comforts all behind. I do not know very much about her story. Sadly, she passed away before I could get to know her well.
In this post, we will be using my estranged family history to explore the constructs of identity and ‘Filipino-ness’ in Winnipeg. I am sure that there are many of us second generation Filipino-Canadians who know little about our roots and want to learn more. We imagine what it might mean to be ‘Filipino’ in a country that isn’t the Philippines and live through the memories of those who have actually lived there. The Canadian part of us is often questioned by the fact that our parents might not have been born here. So, we have to come to terms with what our identity might be and what preconceptions our race represents. How much of our understanding of race influences the construction of our identity? Does history have anything to say about this?
This post will examine the experiences of Canada’s Red River Métis and the Philippines’ mestizo as a reference to understanding mixed racial identities. It will conclude with a review of my distant cousin’s genealogical website (www.familiasauza.web.com) and his perception of our European ancestry.
Before I examine the mestizo experience in the Philippines, I think it is important to first reference the Métis experience here at home. According to political scientist Samantha Hill (2001), the Métis (descendants of European traders and Aboriginal peoples) were historically discriminated against and failed to gain legal recognition until recently. For centuries they were omitted from legislation as neither racially Indian nor European. Notably still, Canadian authorities refused to recognize the Métis people as a nation with their own territory and system of governance. By the late 19th century, Red River Métis lands were confiscated without compensation to make way for European settlers. As Indigenous peoples were moved to reserves, the Métis were left landless and displaced. Hill argues that the Métis identity subsequently descended from a nation to a race (Hill, p.48). In other words, the Métis nation was colonized to fit racial definitions undefined by them, but by the new Canadian government.
The Philippines’ mestizo experience begins in the 17th century when Spanish voyagers and missionaries arrived on the islands to both conquer and convert. They fathered children with local women to add a European mix to an already racially diverse population. For centuries, the Philippine islands were an outpost for indigenous, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Hindu and Muslim traders. The children of these unions with the local peoples fall under the umbrella term today as ‘mestizo’ or ‘mixed’ in Spanish. To have mixed Spanish blood specifically according to political scientist Hazel M. Mcferson (2002), meant a spot on the Spanish colonial apex. The fair-skinned mestizo ranked well above the Indio (the darker skinned indigenous peoples) and below the Spaniards born in Spain and the Filipino creole (Spaniard born on the islands). This hierarchy is still felt today well after Philippine Independence from the Spanish in 1898.The same privilege and wealth of those days past remain with few mestizo clans.
We can see that the experience in Canada and the Philippines is similar, but different. They both share a European connection. However, they differ in terms of their relationship with their European lineage. Canada’s Metis were not accepted as an independent people by Canada’s early full-blooded European leaders. The Philippines’ Spanish Mestizo however, was accepted as a member of Mother Spain (to varying degrees of course) that he/she was more than willing to comply to. This leads us here finally to my estranged family tree and the seemingly unyielding desire to appear more European than Filipino.
The Sauza-Berenguer de Marquina Official Website is written by my distant cousin and family historian, Prince Victor Salamat. He claims to also be known by his German and Irish name, Prince Heinrich Fitzgerald. The site conveys a strong sense of pride in my family’s aristocratic heritage. The reasons for this, we may argue, are of the assumptions associated with our Spanish lineage – that we are well-to-do, educated, and of worldly historical significance. A scan through the site will source relations to Charlemagne, John Fitzgerald Kennedy (yes, that Kennedy), and former Philippine President Corazon Aquino. No data or historical documents are provided to substantiate these claims. There are only mentions in the welcome message of oral histories passed on between generations. I am not writing this blog to support or refute what information is found on the site (maybe in a later post). However, it is worth noting that the site’s overall tone is telling of Filipino perceptions of identity – the more European the better.
So, what does all this mean for the construct of identity and ‘Filipino-ness’ in Winnipeg?
I want to underline the fact that Canadian identity itself in Winnipeg is already tenuous. The Red River Métis and their early claim to what is now Winnipeg never gained formal recognition by the early leaders of today’s Canadian government. There is an underlining urgency today to exert what it means to be an independent Métis. For Filipino-Canadians in Winnipeg, we must add another layer. Before arriving as immigrants to Canada, Filipinos must recall their own historical racial biases. To be fair-skinned, well off, and of Spanish descent in the Philippines means to be closer to resembling (colonial) authority. To come to a settler country like Canada may mean that a mestizo Filipino would expect a lateral change from the racially hierarchical society they left in the Philippines. In other words, being of European descent in the Philippines facilitates upward mobility. But, in Canada, this is not necessarily the case. There is a conflict between Philippine perceptions and Canadian realities when it comes to the construction of ‘Filipino-ness’ in Winnipeg. There is no clear historic advantage to being of mixed European descent here. Perhaps, this is why I don’t share the same overwhelming pro-mestizo sentiment found on my distant cousin’s website. Is this part of what it means for me to be ‘Filipino’ in Winnipeg?
Being Filipino and Canadian really is as complicated as I thought.
Sources:
Hazel M. McFerson. (2002) “Filpino Self Identity and Self-Image in Historical Perspective” in H.M. McFerson, ed. Mixed Blessing: The Impact of the American Colonial Experience on Politics and Society in the Philippines. Westport: Greenwood Press. pp. 13-42.
Samantha Hill. (2001) Race and nation building: a comparison of Canadian Metis and Mexican Mestizos. Masters of Arts Thesis. University of British Columbia. https://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/11311 (cited 23 September 2013).